<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The ContractGC &#187; Contract Provisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contractgc.com/category/contract-provisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contractgc.com</link>
	<description>Lawblogging for Entrepreneurs and Small Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;What Did I Just Sign?&#8221;&#8211;Notice Provisions</title>
		<link>http://contractgc.com/2010/04/06/what-did-i-just-sign-notice-provisions/</link>
		<comments>http://contractgc.com/2010/04/06/what-did-i-just-sign-notice-provisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcolsonesq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["What Did I Just Sign?"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Provisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contractgc.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently reviewed a contract for a client that had the following Notices provision (a provision which specifies how one party should provide notice to the other party under the contract):
Any notice or communication hereunder must be in writing, and shall be personally delivered, or sent bytelegram, telex or facsimile, or by registered or certified [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently reviewed a contract for a client that had the following Notices provision (a provision which specifies how one party should provide notice to the other party under the contract):</p>
<blockquote><p>Any notice or communication hereunder must be in writing, and shall be personally delivered, or sent by<strong>telegram, telex</strong> or facsimile, or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, and if given by registered or certified mail, same shall be deemed to have been given and received three days after its mailing, postage prepaid to the address listed below. Such notices or communication shall be given to the parties hereto at the following addresses&#8230;  [<em>emphasis added]</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Now, notice provisions like this one are standard boilerplate; when drafting a contract, attorneys just cut and paste them from every other contract they&#8217;ve drafted.  I know, I&#8217;ve done it myself&#8211;why re-invent the wheel?  But this particular notice provision shows how important it is to actually READ the boilerplate provisions you&#8217;re using.  Even though it may be &#8220;just boilerplate&#8221;, the language forms a part of the contract, and either party may rely upon it.  So read the boilerplate, and if it doesn&#8217;t capture what you want&#8211;or if it&#8217;s outdated or obsolete&#8211;then change it!</p>
<p>Or else the Western Union or Pony Express guy may be showing up on the doorstep with a Notice to Cure Breach, or a Notice of Renewal, etc.  Or, such notices may be arriving by Telex.  Now, I&#8217;ll admit I&#8217;ve seen enough Westerns to know what a telegram is, but I have no idea what a &#8220;Telex&#8221; is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be right back&#8211;</p>
<p>OK, I Googled it.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegraphy#Telex" target="_blank">According to Wikipedia:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>By 1935, message routing was the last great barrier to full automation. Large telegraphy providers began to develop systems that used telephone-like rotary dialing to connect teletypes. These machines were called &#8220;Telex&#8221;. Telex machines first performed rotary-telephone-style pulse dialing for circuit switching, and then sent data by Baudot code. This &#8220;type A&#8221; Telex routing functionally automated message routing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, I haven&#8217;t been in your office recently, but I would bet money that you do NOT have a Telex machine plugged in over there in the corner.  So read the notice provisions, and if they contain any communication methods that don&#8217;t exist in your office&#8211;delete them, so you don&#8217;t end up in court one day arguing over whether proper notice was received, as the other party is swearing they Telex&#8217;ed you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://contractgc.com/2010/04/06/what-did-i-just-sign-notice-provisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;What did I just sign?&#8221;&#8211;Inaugural Post</title>
		<link>http://contractgc.com/2010/01/14/what-did-i-just-sign-inaugural-post/</link>
		<comments>http://contractgc.com/2010/01/14/what-did-i-just-sign-inaugural-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcolsonesq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["What Did I Just Sign?"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Provisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contractgc.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Don’t worry about it, this is just our boilerplate.  No, it’s not negotiable.”
“All that small type printed in light-gray on the back of our invoice?  That’s just our standard terms, don’t worry about them.  Just sign where indicated.”
We’ve all heard this from customers and vendors.  Many of you likely don’t bother to read the “small [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Don’t worry about it, this is just our boilerplate.  No, it’s not negotiable.”</p>
<p>“All that small type printed in light-gray on the back of our invoice?  That’s just our standard terms, don’t worry about them.  Just sign where indicated.”</p>
<p>We’ve all heard this from customers and vendors.  Many of you likely don’t bother to read the “small print”, and if you do read it, you probably wonder whether it’s intentionally dense and inscrutable; the words may all be in English, but string them together and you have complete gobbledygook.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this “boilerplate”, those “standard terms”, they really do matter, and they can have a significant impact on your company.  They allocate risk between you and your customer/vendor, and they can limit your rights to sue and collect if the other party misbehaves.  When they’re the other party’s terms, they are often very one-sided and, frankly, unfair.  And, they often ARE negotiable, if you try hard enough (and if you’re reasonable in your demands).</p>
<p>In this blog, I will periodically be discussing common contract terms, what they mean, and how they can be negotiated or modified, in a recurring feature called “What did I just sign?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://contractgc.com/2010/01/14/what-did-i-just-sign-inaugural-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.371 seconds -->

